Last year, I met a good friend of mine today from an online
dating app. Even though she worked in the finance industry like myself, she had
set for herself a goal to create, as opposed to consume, as much as possible.
Her life habits were directed by this philosophy and while it was interesting to
talk about, I did not think it was anything particularly novel. I had
encountered the same sort of advice many times before in books, podcasts, and
magazines. Be Creative seemed like
just one of many vague and redundant life tips, somewhere in between Exercise the Mind and Appreciate Art.
I have since begun to view creativity in a different light
entirely. I realized that the people I admire most are creators: the makers of
products, the providers of services, the doers and the entertainers. We value
creators because creators generate their own value that is often a net positive
to society. What we create define us because our creations are our contributions
to the world – they are the tools we use to impact the people the around us,
and they are what we will be remembered for. To be proactive and to choose to
create allows us to take control of our destiny.
Writing is the most useful and productive form of creating. It
trains the mind to think deeply about ideas and to organize them in a logical
manner so that they are easily understood by others. Writing, once mastered, is
the most sincere and broadly encompassing reflection of our individuality. Contrary
to the popular axiom, I believe that a piece of good writing can reveal more
about an author than a thousand photographs. I will commit myself to improving
my writing every day because it is the skill I believe will yield the greatest
benefits to me in all aspects of my life.
The intrinsic benefits
of writing - February 28
Writing daily benefits us by helping us develop four critical
life skills:
Writing helps us think critically
How often are we consciously aware of our thoughts and our
surroundings? It is frighteningly easy for us to move unknowingly from one day
to the next, and not appreciate the beauty and complexity of the world we live in.
Writing forces us to pause for a moment and consciously reflect on how we can
approach our lives better.
Writing trains personal discipline
Committing a certain amount of time every day to write can
be arduous and frustrating at times, particularly when there appear to be more
interesting things to do. However, writing every day, like any new habit, is a
fine test of our internal discipline and habit formation skills. We exercise
our willpower every time we boot up the laptop or pick up a pen, and can
achieve a boost of confidence through writing that will help us succeed in
other goals.
Writing improves our communication skills
Effective communication is key to success in the world of business
and personal relationships. An eloquent communicator is respected, admired, and
exceedingly attractive. Practicing writing can help us sort the flow of our
internal dialogue into an easily understood message, and allow us to share our personal
intellectual brilliance with the world.
Writing stimulates our creative energy
The human mind has vast creative potential, and writing enables
us to make the most of this innate gift. The ephemeral thoughts in our head can
be endless source for creativity and it would be a wasted opportunity if we do
not capitalize on this limitless resource. The more we write, the more we
think, and when we think more, we find the inspiration and knowledge to create.
Why invest in US equities - March 1
Over the past 3 months, the US
stock market has been buoyed by optimism about President Trump’s economic
policies. At first glance, the situation seems absurd. Back in October, the general media consensus
was that a Trump win would usher in immediate economic doom. Volatility was expected to reign as America severed
its connection with the global community. American consumers would spend less
as domestic prices rose, and international investors and trade partners would
take their business abroad in anticipation of a stagnant US economy. Fortunately
for the US, public sentiment shifted for the better, and the S&P 500 went
on a 15% tear since the November general election.
Much of the rising expectations
center around two elements of Trump’s economic plan: tax reform and
infrastructure spending. Trump’s proposals, in similar fashion to his campaigns,
have been light on specific details. However, they are perceived to be positive
for the economy, and the markets have responded accordingly.
The first element is to revamp
significant portions of the tax code to benefit businesses and domestic investment.
In particular, Trump promises to cut corporate tax rates significantly from the
current level of 35% to a range of 15 – 20%. Additionally, he plans to
introduce a repatriation tax of 10% that will provide an incentive for
businesses with significant overseas cash holdings to invest them back into the
US. Companies such as Apple (which holds an absurd USD246 billion offshore) have
indicated they will shuffle overseas cash back into the domestic tax net. Trump
also wants to explore changing the definition of corporate income so that
imports are taxed 20% and while export taxes are eliminated – this reform would
further incentivize companies to keep their operations within the US.
Trump’s second plan is atypical to
the Republican Party’s platform, which normally calls for fiscal conservatism. Throughout
the general election, Trump loudly broadcasted his support for fiscal stimulus
by boosting infrastructure spending on America’s dilapidated and crumbling roads,
bridges and airports. Trump estimates his plan will cost upwards of USD 1
trillion, but no one knows yet clear how much of that is actual infrastructure
investment, or where the tax dollars will come from. Regardless, the spending
proposal addresses a real concern for the US because the country’s
infrastructure is indeed in poor shape. Trump will likely find support from
both the Republican and Democrat camps to implement the plan, and if it is
successful, the commitment will help the US maintain its near-full employment
rate for the foreseeable future.
*Of course it is Mexico that will
pay for the wall, but the US will front the money first ; )
Uber CEO Row - March 2
The recent controversy between
Uber CEO Travis Kalanick and an Uber Black driver irks me on so many levels.
The social outrage that erupted as a result, and Kalanick’s subsequent apology,
is representative of how Internet media and overzealous netizens can facilitate
a narrative in which logic and rational business perspective are drowned out.
I have long been astounded by how Uber
has succeeded so phenomenally despite its toxic management culture. It appears that
corporate misdeeds such as misogynist treatment of employees, public corporate
sabotage, and antagonization of the press, does little to hamper growth if
there is sufficient demand.
However, in this particular
situation, people have imposed their personal bias against Uber on Kalanick. The
Uber Black driver and Kalanick both had valid reasons to be frustrated. The
driver had leased a high-end luxury car to drive for Uber Black, the premium and
most expensive version of Uber. In the past year, Uber Black demand had dropped
considerably as passengers opted for the more budget-friendly UberX and
UberPool. Without sufficient ride volume, the driver was stuck with monthly lease
payments on a vehicle he purposely obtained for Uber.
On the other side, Kalanick had
spent the last several years fighting off competitors across the globe. He lost
the battle in China to Didi, and still could not shake off Lyft despite burning
billions of dollars year after year to undercut its smaller rival. The only
meaningful differentiator between ride-sharing apps is price, so introducing low-end
options such as UberX and UberPool was the only logical method to capture
market share. Kalanick made the only decision he could to stay in business, and
now he was berated by a driver who owed his economic livelihood to Uber.
Both the driver and Kalanick
failed to emphasize with the other’s situation, but unfortunately for Kalanick,
the bar is higher for the CEO of the world’s most valuable private tech
company.
North Korea - March 3
I am fascinated by how North
Korea, seemingly a relic of a bygone era, can continue to exist in the 21st
century. While the rest of the developing world has undergone radical political,
economic, and cultural transformations, North Korea has clung to a totalitarian
system of government that is in many ways more repressive and backwards than
the Soviet system it was modelled after. Even more striking is that the DPRK
will continue to exist indefinitely, due to a combination of nuclear
deterrence, irresolvable foreign policy differences between China and the US,
and the North Korean government’s violent suppression of domestic dissent and
foreign influence.
Today we find it difficult to
reconcile that North Korea and South Korea were virtually indistinguishable a
mere two generations ago. Since that time, the South Korean economy has thrived
through capitalism and free market economy, as well as through the direct
support of the United States. North Korea was on par with its southern
neighbour until most of the 60’s when the South Korean
capitalistic model really started paying dividends. The collapse of the Soviet
Union exacerbated North Korea’s plight, by taking away direct foreign aid, and
eliminating altogether subsidies for commodities such as oil.
North Korea today is by many
standards worse off than it was 30 years ago. The regime’s economy has clearly
regressed to a point where it is obvious to any observer that South Korea has
the more fundamentally sound economic system. North Korea’s response is only to
create a scenario straight out of 1984,
where the government uses the constant threat of destruction by foreign powers to promote a
military-first policy. By shutting off communication with the outside world and
promoting the idea that only the military can ensure survival for its citizens, the government has created a
fanatically devoted and nationalistic population who are willing to sacrifice
everything to the state.
Tennis - March 4
I am ball sport fanatic in
general, and I reckon I would become obsessed with any ball sport if I played it
at a fundamentally sound level. It just so happened that my environment growing
up led me to play more tennis than any other sport, and now my skills are focused
almost exclusively on tennis.
Tennis’s thrill is in competition.
I get a jolt of adrenaline every time I spike an ace or stretch myself to reach
a tough shot, but the beauty of the game goes beyond its physicality. I love
tennis, especially singles tennis, for its psychological stimulus. Over the
course of a multiple-set tennis match, a player goes through peaks and troughs
in terms of mental state and playing ability. Tennis is a game that rewards
consistency above all else, which makes frustration and impatience the bane of
a competitive tennis player.
Therefore, every singles tennis
match is battle of the mind as much as the ball. There are two opponents a
player must overcome – the one standing across the net and the one inside his
own head. Both players seek to gain a psychological edge over the other by
identifying and attacking weaknesses, adjusting to the other’s playstyle, and
then readjusting to the opponent’s adjustment, over and over again. Against a
similarly skilled opponent, the typical tennis match is rarely comfortable. It
takes all of a player's concentration to stay focused and avoid errors, and to patiently execute a game plan.
Singles tennis is a purely
individual effort where there are no teammates to defer to or to blame, and
where is nearly no luck factor. The match’s outcome favours the best executor
on the court that day, where each careless mishit or errant long ball is the
fault of the individual alone. To reach the mental zone where I play my
peak-level tennis is almost like being in a zen-like state, and it is the
reason why I keep coming back to the game.
Over the past few years, I have
wondered what my life end goal is. If I have a steady source of income, a
wonderful family, and physical and mental health, would I be content? The
thought exercise brings me back to Maslow’s pyramid – if my physical, material,
social, and self-esteem needs are secured, would I aspire for more?
The answer is obvious to me today.
Life is too short to not aspire to make an impact greater than ourselves. It is
too brief to not make the utmost effort towards achieving our wildest dreams,
which should go far beyond just securing a comfortable life. We are the masters of
our own destiny and the protagonist of each of our personal stories; it would be a tragedy
if we resigned ourselves to reach for anything less than what we truly desire.
Now, this desire might be
subjective. It may be tempting to become complacent and to reason that a
well-paying job is sufficient because it meets our basic needs. However, if you
had unlimited resources and complete guarantee of success, would you be content
with a satisfactory job? If you know that by simply striving for everything you
could possibly want, that even if despite your best efforts you fall short, but
you will reach much further than if you did not try at all, would you go for
it?
By the simple virtue of being born
in this generation, as the free citizen of a country with historically
unprecedented opportunity, mobility, and wealth, we owe it to ourselves to make
the most of our environment to pursue greatness. The human mind is adaptable
beyond measure, and we can cultivate the necessary skills, knowledge, and personal habits, if we have the proper desire. As Friedrich Nietzsche opined, “He
who has a why to live can bear almost any how”. This succinct summary
of the human condition applies to our dreams as well - if we invest in a strong enough reason to reach the endpoint, the journey will take care of
itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment